<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long history behind BC&#8217;s group home cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://momsnetwork.ca/2010/06/28/the-long-history-behind-bcs-group-home-cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://momsnetwork.ca/2010/06/28/the-long-history-behind-bcs-group-home-cuts/</link>
	<description>BC families supporting people with special needs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 03:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://momsnetwork.ca/2010/06/28/the-long-history-behind-bcs-group-home-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 17:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momsnetwork.ca/?p=882#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Hi Linda, I discussed your question with staff at the BC Association for Community Living, who have a better understanding of the legal &amp; policy requirements than I do, and here is the response from their Executive Director:

&lt;em&gt;&quot;My experience with investigations of abuse is that the third party should be the RCMP or local police. Once there is the involvement of police all other processes should stop pending the outcome. If you feel that the CLBC investigation has not been sufficient and you have concerns about harm done and/or safety of a person then involving the police is appropriate. The involvement of the police is not a matter of choice for CLBC or any other body, agency or service provider.&quot; &lt;/em&gt;

Is this helpful? One of the key issues that has come to the forefront in the community living advocacy campaign that we launched with a broad coalition of other partner groups in the fall is the lack of an effective independent voice to provide oversight, respond to complaints, provide public reporting, etc. The structure of existing complaint resolution/service quality mechanisms is simply not working and has emerged from our community forums and other feedback as a critical gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Linda, I discussed your question with staff at the BC Association for Community Living, who have a better understanding of the legal &amp; policy requirements than I do, and here is the response from their Executive Director:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;My experience with investigations of abuse is that the third party should be the RCMP or local police. Once there is the involvement of police all other processes should stop pending the outcome. If you feel that the CLBC investigation has not been sufficient and you have concerns about harm done and/or safety of a person then involving the police is appropriate. The involvement of the police is not a matter of choice for CLBC or any other body, agency or service provider.&#8221; </em></p>
<p>Is this helpful? One of the key issues that has come to the forefront in the community living advocacy campaign that we launched with a broad coalition of other partner groups in the fall is the lack of an effective independent voice to provide oversight, respond to complaints, provide public reporting, etc. The structure of existing complaint resolution/service quality mechanisms is simply not working and has emerged from our community forums and other feedback as a critical gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Riedlinger</title>
		<link>http://momsnetwork.ca/2010/06/28/the-long-history-behind-bcs-group-home-cuts/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Riedlinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://momsnetwork.ca/?p=882#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Does CLBC allow outside (CLBC Quality Control) non-partial investigations into abuse and if so how do I make a request for one?  I requested an investigation by CLBC Quality Control but was told I couldn&#039;t access the results.  They also have not done a proper investigation because they have not contacted anyone directly involved (ie: witnesses).  Any ideas would be appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does CLBC allow outside (CLBC Quality Control) non-partial investigations into abuse and if so how do I make a request for one?  I requested an investigation by CLBC Quality Control but was told I couldn&#8217;t access the results.  They also have not done a proper investigation because they have not contacted anyone directly involved (ie: witnesses).  Any ideas would be appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

